Legal Opinion

State v. Gallup

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 6, 1989No. J87-1760; CA A49289PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for sodomy in the first degree. ORS 163.405(b). He assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to grant his motion for change of venue and to three evidentiary rulings made at trial. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant defendant’s motion for change of venue and, if the court erred in making one of the evidentiary rulings, that error does not require reversal. Accordingly, we affirm.

Defendant owned and operated a preschool in Rose-burg. His wife operated a separate private kindergarten in Roseburg, and his son operated another…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. HerreraOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. BerriosNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Stephen James Kilpatrick v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API