State ex rel. Helander v. Clausen
Washington Supreme Court
Application filed in the supreme court May 2, 1917, for a writ of mandamus to compel the state auditor to issue a warrant in payment of the salary of a deputy inspector and supervisor of public offices.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
This is an original proceeding in this court wherein the relator, Helander, seeks a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, Clausen, as state auditor, to issue to him a warrant upon the state general fund for his salary as deputy inspector and supervisor of public offices, for the month of April, 1917.
The conceded facts may be summarized as follows. Relator is now, and has been for several years past, a duly appointed, qualified, and acting deputy inspector and supervisor of public offices. His salary, as such deputy, has been fixed by respondent Clausen, as state auditor, as it is conceded…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shattuck v. KincaidOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Peel v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Lightfoot v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Leddy v. CornellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- State ex rel. Brainerd v. GrimesWashington Supreme Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Pacific Bridge Co. v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- State ex rel. Shuff v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Van Orsdel v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1942