Legal Opinion

Herzberg v. Wisconsin Tax Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

No contention is or well could be made but that it was proper, under sub. (5), sec. 72.15, Stats., for inheritance tax purposes, to appraise, determine and find, as was done, that at the time of Mr. Herzberg’s death the “clear market value” of the then present worth of the future payments to be made to the estate under the contracts covering renewal commissions was $66,071. That such was a correct computation was not then and is not now questioned. The inheritance tax proper to be assessed upon such amount as the value of such future estate as of the time of its transfer by the death of Mr.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Irwin v. GavitSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. State ex rel. Hickox v. WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Norris v. Wisconsin Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Estate of Rogovin v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Norris v. Wisconsin Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API