Legal Opinion
Baker v. BDO Seidman, L.L.P.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 29, 2005No. C-05-2500 EMCPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REMAND TO STATE COURT (Docket No. 13)
CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs in this action are six individuals who hired Defendants to provide tax services and investment advice. Plaintiffs initially filed suit against Defendants in state court. Subsequently, Defendants removed the ease to federal court on the basis that, even though Plaintiffs pled only state law claims, there was a substantial federal issue involved in the case. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to remand the case to state court. Having considered the parties’…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Broder v. Cablevision Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Rains v. Criterion Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Standard & Poor's Rating Agency LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Runaj v. Wells Fargo BankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2009
- Sullivan v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2006
- Lighting Science Group Corp. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.District Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Samuel Trading, LLC v. Diversified Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.