People v. Goodwin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J. *
Defendant appeals from judgment, after jury verdict, of conviction of armed robbery of Ken’s Pharmacy and from judgment, after jury trial, of armed robbery of Handy Pantry Market. This court appointed counsel to representhim ;on this appeal.
Questions Presented
1. Defendant’s right to counsel was not abridged because of counsel also representing codefendant Smith.
2. No error in consolidating for trial the two charges.
3. No error in the absence of defendant’s counsel at the lineup.
4. Alleged misconduct of prosecutor occurring on cross-examination of defendant concerning use of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. DillingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968