United States v. Ten Thousand Six Hundred Forty-eight ($10,648.00) dollars in United States Currency
District Court, D. New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
*164 ORDER
LANDYA McCAFFERTY, United States Magistrate Judge.
This is a forfeiture action in rem, brought by the United States of America, under Rule G of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions. Specifically, the United States seeks the forfeiture of $10,648 in United States currency that was seized from the residence of Karla Schulz by police officers executing a search warrant. Schulz has filed a claim for the currency. Before the court is the government’s motion for summary judgment. Schulz has neither objected to the government’s motion nor…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dávila v. Corporación De Puerto Rico Para La Difusión PúblicaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Noonan v. Staples, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Acosta v. Ames Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Markel American Insurance v. Díaz-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Premises Known as 3639-2nd St., N.E.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. $365,575.00 More or LessDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2024