Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. United States
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
In this Federal Tort Claims Act case, Dr. Richard J. Hill (Dr. Hill) moves to dismiss the government’s third-party complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction.. The issue is adequately briefed and oral argument will not materially aid in its resolution. I will grant Dr.- Hill’s motion for the reasons set forth below.
I
Dr. Hill is Tasha Hill’s grandfather. In August 1988 Dr. .Hill commenced a physician-patient relationship with his granddaughter in Phoenix, Arizona when he administered initial immunizations and performed a “well-baby”…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SCC Communications Corp. v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2002
- Pegasus Helicopters, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1997