United States v. Ullman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CLARY, District Judge.
The above two eases are before the Court on motions by the United States to set aside and vacate that portion of the decree of interpleader entered in each ease which allowed costs and attorneys’ fees to the United Benefit Life Insurance Company, defendant. No question has been raised as to the propriety of the decree of interpleader, and any question as to the reasonableness of the amounts of counsel fees awarded in each case was expressly waived by the Government at the argument of the motions. Only one legal question is in issue and to put that question in its proper…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Puget Sound Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- RF Ball Construction Company v. JacobsDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1956
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. DoranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Narragansett Bay Gardens, Inc. v. Grant Construction Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959
- Ford Motor Co. v. Hackart Construction Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
- United States v. Henry's Bay View Inn., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.