Legal Opinion

Hitz v. Baron Bros.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County

Decided July 1, 1923Published

1Opinion of the CourtBroomall, J.

— This was a suit brought by the plaintiffs against the defendants to recover the purchase price of a lot of porch swings.

The defence was that they were sold according to sample, and that they did not comply with the sample. The defendants refused to accept the last shipment, and this shipment went into a warehouse.

The jury retired late in the day, and during the night they came to an agreement, sealed their verdict and separated. On coming into court the next morning, their sealed verdict was opened by the court, and it was found to be in favor of the plaintiffs, with the stipulation that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reitenbaugh v. LudwickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  2. Wolfran v. EysterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  3. Columbia Glass Co. v. Atlantic Glass Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Beecher v. NewcomerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API