Winton v. Davenport
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Per curiam
On January 14, 1955, we denied this petitioner leave to file his petition because of the want of necessary parties. On January 22, 1955, petitioner filed a new motion for leave to file petition, to the same effect as that formerly filed, but with all necessary persons made parties to the original proceeding in this court.
It seems that in late 1953 and early 1954 the petitioner was the plaintiff in a cause pending on the docket of the 89th District Court. That cause was styled No; 52,762-C, Gordon Lee Winton vs. Advanced Oil Tools, Inc. The case was tried by Judge Louis T. Holland, Judge of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MuseTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Ridley v. McCallum Dist. JudgeTexas Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- Howell v. MauzyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Canales v. SalinasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Phagan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Fulton v. FinchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Charles Ben Howell v. Oscar Mauzy, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994