Legal Opinion

George v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 10, 1986No. 72561PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was indicted for the offenses of rape and aggravated sodomy and during the course of defendant’s trial defense counsel asked one of the State’s witnesses whether he had “developed a friendship or something . . .” with the complainant. The trial court admonished defense counsel, warning that “[i]f there’s a breach of the Shield law, however minor, we’ll start all over.” Later, defense counsel again asked the same witness whether he and the complainant “were close friends.” The trial court later declared a mistrial and subse*549quently entered the following…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phelps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. George v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  3. George v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Phelps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API