Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Dail

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1948No. 631PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellant, plaintiff below, was a tenant of certain dwelling property. She occupied the first floor and sublet the upper floor. Appellee Charles L. Dail bought the property and notified appellant that he desired possession for his own use. Appellant promised to vacate as soon as she found other quarters. Thereafter the parties agreed that Dail and his wife should move into the upper floor, which had been vacated by the subtenant; that appellant should continue to occupy the first floor until she found another place to live, and that in the meantime she would not be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. Associated Retail Credit Men of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Mathews v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. Ault v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Mirando v. MirandoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. Schienle v. EckelsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bown v. HamiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Buck v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Robinson v. SariskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Parker v. SteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Hinton v. Sealander Brokerage Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API