Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Fox Film Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 4, 1937PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The suit is for infringement of statutory copyright. The present motion is by the defendant to dismiss the bill as insufficient on its face.

' The bill alleges that the Theatre Magazine Company formerly published the Theatre Magazine, that it caused the August, 1929, issue of the magazine to be copyrighted by registry and deposit of two copies and by notice of copyright on the issue itself, thereby obtaining copyright as to each part of the contents of the issue; that the Theatre Magazine Company later assigned to the plaintiff its copyright in the cover design' of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mifflin v. R. H. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Dam v. Kirk La Shelle Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  3. Mail & Express Co. v. Life Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  4. New Fiction Pub. Co. v. Star Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915
  5. Public Ledger v. New York TimesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Goodis v. United Artists Television, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  2. Geisel v. Poynter Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. Ilyin v. Avon Publications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  4. Self-Realization Fellowship Church v. Ananda Church Of Self-RealizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Self-Realization Fellowship Church v. Ananda Church of Self-RealizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API