Legal Opinion

Scrivner v. Anchor Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 27, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Taylor District' Court. — Hon. H. 3L Evans, Judge. Action to recover for a loss under a fire insurance policy held by plaintiff in defendant company. The defense was that plaintiff had violated the condition of his policy against other insurance. There was a trial to -the court without a jury, and on the evidence offered the court made its findings of fact, resulting in a Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.

Plaintiff’s policy in the sum of $3,000 was issued in May, 1907, covering a stock of merchandise consisting of shelf and heavy hardware, farm implements, and such other goods as are usually kept for sale in similar stores, and described as contained in a frame building in the town of Buchanan. On the the 2d of September following, before noon, plaintiff had some conversation with one Blagrave, the soliciting agent for the defendant- company, through whom the policy had been procured, with reference to additional insurance on the stock to the amount of $2,500 or $3,000, but later in the day…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Independent School District v. Fidelity InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  2. Liquid Carbonic Acid Manufacturing Co. v. Phœnix Insurance Co. of LondonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Wensel v. Property Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Lutz v. Anchor Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. State Bank v. MentzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. McCoy v. National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Hart v. Home Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. Rowell v. Fireman's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API