Legal Opinion

Thoman v. Ashley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 18, 1964No. 4548PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Judge.

By this petition for certiorari the petitioners endeavor to present for the Court’s determination the interesting and important question of whether nonsuits are still in existence in view of the 1962 amendment to Rule 1.35(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A. However, we are unable to reach the nonsuit question be■cause the record on its face shows the ■striking by the Court of the defense of res judicata, the order here sought to be reviewed, was correct and in no way irregular.

Petitioners were defendants in a negli■gence action brought by plaintiff-respondents.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hinchee v. FisherSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Betts v. BettsSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Peaslee v. MichalskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Moorhead v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Florida · 1947

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Purtell v. TehanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Donnell v. Industrial Fire and Casualty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Cook v. LichtblauDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Thermofin, Inc. v. WoodruffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Armellini Express Lines, Inc. v. SextonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API