State v. Navallez

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of theft of property having a value over $100 and less than $1,000, a class 4 felony, with a prior felony conviction. On appeal he argues that the trial court committed reversible error in:

1) Precluding a prior out-of-court statement of a prosecution witness,

2) Failing to give a requested “identification” instruction, and

3) Denying his motion to suppress identification evidence.

*173We find no reversible error and affirm.

This crime was committed in broad daylight at Zody’s department store in Tucson when the appellant took the victim’s purse from…