Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Schoenfield & Hunter Drilling Co. v. Combs

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 27, 1934No. 24863PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

This is an original action to review an order of the State Industrial Commission, wherein a motion to discontinue claimant’s compensation was overruled, and it was found by the Commission that claimant -was still temporarily totally disabled and ordered compensation continued. Sehoenfield & Hunter Drilling Company, as employer, and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, a corporation, are petitioners, and M. C. Combs and State Industrial Commission are respondents.

An award was heretofore made allowing claimant compensation for temporary total disability. Action to review such award was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Noel v. PottsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Schoenfield & Hunter Drilling Co. v. CombsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Protho v. NetteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Cameron & Henderson, Inc. v. FranksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. National Zinc Company v. SeaboltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Pure Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Wilkerson Chevrolet, Inc. v. MackeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API