Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 12, 1995No. 146PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

The issue this Court must resolve in the instant ease is whether Maryland Rule 4-264 or the federal and/or state constitution entitles a defendant charged with child abuse and related sexual offenses to obtain pre-trial discovery review of the victim’s psychotherapy records maintained by the victim’s private psychotherapist. Our answer is no.

I

The petitioner, Eugene Franklin Goldsmith, was charged with committing sexual child abuse, second degree rape, second and third degree sexual offense, and unnatural and perverted sexual practices on his adopted stepdaughter, whom we shall…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Jonas Dorian NeiderbachSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. United States v. Carl Hach and Francis HachCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. BarrosoKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API