Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Marmet Corp. v. Becon Services Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 17, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-2502PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

REVERCOMB, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks recovery under the Miller Act (40 U.S.C. § 270b) for allegedly unpaid construction material bills. Both plaintiff and defendants now move for summary judgment. The Court heard full argument on the motions at a hearing conducted on July 15, 1992, based on the facts as set forth in the parties’ pleadings and affidavits. The parties agree that there are no material facts in dispute. For the reasons set forth below, the Court must order summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Facts

The essential facts are as follows. Defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Sherman v. Carter Constr. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. Glassman Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  3. United States v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  4. Silver Hill Concrete Corp. v. Thomason Industries Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Board of Education ex rel. Bertolino v. Vince Kelly Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API