Legal Opinion

Trevisano v. Giordano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendants presented evidence sufficient to demonstrate that, at the death of plaintiffs grandparents in 1949 or 1950, title to the premises vested in their children as tenants in common (see, Kraker v Roll, 100 AD2d 424, 429). It is presumed that the exclusive possession of a co-tenant is not adverse to the other tenants. Exclusive possession alone is not the equivalent of an ouster (see, Perkins v Volpe, 146 AD2d 617, lv dismissed 74 NY2d 791). Although plaintiffs parents remained in possession in excess of 10 years, the expiration of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kraker v. RollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Perkins v. VolpeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. In re the Estate of KelleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perez v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Loveless Family Trust v. KoenigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Gonzalez v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API