Legal Opinion

Kingsbury, Inc. v. GE Power Conversion UK, Ltd.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 24, 2014No. Civil Action No. 14-3742PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

This action arises out of the construction of a motor for a nuclear reactor that Defendant GE Power Conversion UK, Limited (“GE”) was building in South Korea. Plaintiff Kingsbury, Inc. (“Kingsbury”) contracted with GE to design, manufacture, and install the bearings for the motor. During construction of the nuclear reactor, the motor experienced a catastrophic failure. Kingsbury brings suit against GE seeking a declaratory judgment that it is not responsible for the catastrophic failure of the motor and alleging four counts of breach of contract.1 I…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. Kirleis v. Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Azer Scientific Incorporated v. Quidel CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. Eureka Resources, LLC v. Howden Roots, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API