Legal Opinion
Clayton v. Gold Bond Building Products
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 20, 1987No. Civ. 86-2916PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RALPH M. FREEMAN, District Judge.
This action was brought by six former employees of Defendant Gold Bond Building Products (Gold Bond). On July 7,1986, Plaintiffs filed a three count complaint, seeking to recover damages allegedly resulting from their discharge by Gold Bond. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship of the parties. 1 28 U.S.C. § 1332. In Count I, Plaintiffs allege a claim for wrongful discharge. Count II alleges a claim for “impairment of economic opportunities.” Finally, in Count III, Plaintiffs seek to impose liability for “outrageous and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- James H. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRATTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Fred S. Almy, and D.E. Stolberg, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United Government Security Officers of America v. Akal Security, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006