Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Benedict v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1987No. 86CA1701Published

1Concurrence

CRISWELL, Judge,

specially concurring.

Since I consider the result reached by the majority to be correct, I concur, generally, with Parts II and III of the majority opinion. I write separately, however, because I am not positive of the soundness of either Pinkard Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission, 694 P.2d 858 (Colo.App.1984) or Grover v. Industrial Commission, 739 P.2d 900 (Colo.App.1987).

In my view, § 8-53-113, C.R.S. (1986 Repl. Vol. 3B), which requires a petition to reopen a claim to be filed in order to end or diminish medical benefits, contemplates that such benefits as may be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pinkard Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Grover v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API