Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Ryan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 1979No. 5996PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs Hooper and Baker were payees of a $25,000. installment note, secured by lien on an apartment house, executed by co-makers defendant Ryan and C. K. Booker. The note was paid down to $24,000. and defaulted. Plaintiffs caused trustee’s sale to be had on the property and bought it in for $14,000., leaving a deficiency on the note of $10,000. Plaintiffs filed this suit for such deficiency against defendants Ryan and C. K. Booker. After such suit was filed Booker paid plaintiffs $300. cash plus a $3,000. installment note secured by real estate, and for such…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reed v. BuckTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Wohlhuter v. St. Charles Lumber & Fuel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Bute v. BrainerdTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Shield v. First Coleman Nat. Bank of ColemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Hallowell v. TurnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Crimmins v. LowryTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. United States v. Unum, Inc. And Lance W. DreyerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Vahlco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Seafirst Center Ltd. Partnership v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bishop v. United Missouri Bank of CarthageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API