Melton v. Detroit Flame Hardening Co.

Appellees filed a motion to dismiss. The motion is predicated upon the fact that in this appeal, which is from an interlocutory order, appellants failed to file their brief within the 10-day period after the filing of their transcript as prescribed by Rule 2-15.

The pertinent facts to the issue presented are as follows:

Appellants’ transcript was filed on October 15, 1964. On November 9, appellants, with the consent of the court, filed a petition for extension of time in which to file their brief. The brief, after subsequent extensions of time, was filed on January 8, 1965. Thereafter appellees…