Legal Opinion

Conceptual Development, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Hampton Township

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 2, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Conceptual Development, Inc. (Conceptual Development) and Landmark Properties, Inc. (Landmark) (collectively, Landowners) appeal from the October 6, 2004, order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court), which affirmed the decision of the Hampton Township (Township) Zoning Hearing Board (ZHB), denying Landowners’ request for a variance in connection with the parking and landscaping requirements set forth in the Township’s Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance). The issue before us is whether Landowners were entitled to a deemed approval under section 908(9)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Quality Food Markets, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. H. R. Miller Co. v. BitlerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Borough of Prospect Park v. MolnarCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Swedeland Road Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Pocono Sales Corp. v. Bear Creek TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API