Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Finck

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 1, 2005No. 04-422PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Betty C. Dickey, Justice.

Isabelle Taylor (Isabelle) appeals the denial of certain lying-in expenses in a paternity action, contending that the trial court’s order violates Ark. Code Ann. § 9-10-110 (Repl. 2002). This court previously dealt with these parties in In the Matter of Adoption of SCD, 358 Ark. 51, 186 S.W.3d 225 (2004). Isabelle is the mother of the child, and the DePriests are the couple who sought to adopt Isabelle’s baby. Travis Finck (Travis) is the father, who, prior to the baby’s birth, registered as the baby’s father under the Arkansas Putative Father Registry on May 15, 2003.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bean v. Office of Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Ferguson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Huffman v. FisherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Moon v. MarquezSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Belford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Omni Holding & Development Corp. v. C.A.G. Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. X.T. v. M.M.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Taylor v. FinckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API