Heninger v. Peery
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Bland county, affirming a judgment of the County Court of said county in a condemnation proceeding, wherein the defendant in error was one of the applicants, and the plaintiff in error was the contestant.
1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.
This is a writ of error and supersedeas to an order of the Circuit Court of Bland county, affirming an order of the County Court of that county, establishing a public road through the lands of plaintiff in error, Samuel T. Heninger.
It appears that the defendant in error, Thomas' E. Peery, one of the original applicants for the road, is the owner of 822 acres of land on Chestnut Bidge, in that county, which, with several adjoining tracts, is entirely isolated from any public road, the proprietors being dependent upon the sufferance of other landowners for ingress and egress to and from their…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. ForemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
- Zircle v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1903
- Lewis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1848
- Cranford Paving Co. v. BaumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
3Cited by14 opinions
- McGuire v. McGuireWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Long v. ShirleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
- Williamson v. ReadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
- Stewart v. FugateSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- Gallegos v. ConroyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.