In Re Adoption of E.M.A.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
The issue presented is whether appellant, not the spouse of the natural father, may become an adopting parent of his child, when the father gives only “qualified” consent, specifically retaining his parental rights. Our Adoption Act requires, as a prerequisite to adoption, inter alia, either the unqualified consent of natural parents under section 411, or the termination of their parental rights under sections 302 or 311. 1 Susko Adoption Case, 363 Pa. 78, 69 A.2d 132 (1949). The only provision for a qualified consent is contained in section 503:
“Whenever…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re William L.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Schwab Adoption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Susko Adoption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Gunther Adoption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- In Re Adoption of R.B.F.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- S.J.L.S. v. T.L.S.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008
- Commonwealth v. HermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- In Re Adoption of Michael J.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.