Legal Opinion

Elias v. Sahm

New York Marine Court

Decided April 15, 1878Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The plaintiffs and the defendant herein cSiimed §378.75 for commissions from the George F. Blake Manufacturing Company, a corporation doing business under that name.

The plaintiffs thereupon sued the Blake Manufacturing Company, and the company,.upon paying the amount claimed into coiirt, was discharged as a party from the record on an application for interpleader, under the Code, upon the ground that while the company owed the commissions, it was unable to determine whether the plaintiffs or Louis Sahm were entitled' to them, and Sahm was substituted as defend*416ant in the company’s place. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adams v. . SageNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Parsons v. HughesNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  3. Lepper v. NuttmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Comstock v. AmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  5. Marshall v. JoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1845

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API