Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moore v. Knower

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 2017No. 2016-CA-0776Published

1DissentJenkins, J.

hi agree with the majority’s finding that Mr. Moore and Ms. Knower are the co-owners of Abby. I respectfully dissent, however, from the majority’s finding that principles of “equity” can be applied to create a new remedy, when the rules of law governing this dispute are found in the Civil Code articles governing co-ownership and division of property, and when the application of equitable considerations would directly conflict with that positive law. Because I find that the parties’ sole remedy is partition, and because the First City Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over partition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daily Advertiser v. TRANS-LA, ETC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Fishbein v. State ex rel. Louisiana State University Health Sciences CenterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  3. Duckworth v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  4. State v. McCormickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Holland v. TeagueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API