Moore v. Knower
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentJenkins, J.
hi agree with the majority’s finding that Mr. Moore and Ms. Knower are the co-owners of Abby. I respectfully dissent, however, from the majority’s finding that principles of “equity” can be applied to create a new remedy, when the rules of law governing this dispute are found in the Civil Code articles governing co-ownership and division of property, and when the application of equitable considerations would directly conflict with that positive law. Because I find that the parties’ sole remedy is partition, and because the First City Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over partition…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Daily Advertiser v. TRANS-LA, ETC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Fishbein v. State ex rel. Louisiana State University Health Sciences CenterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Duckworth v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- State v. McCormickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Holland v. TeagueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.