Legal Opinion

Gaspard v. Lachney

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1957No. 8613PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARDY, Judge.

Alleging himself to be the holder and owner of a promissory note executed by the defendant, plaintiff instituted this suit for the recovery of the face amount of the note, together with interest and attorney’s fees, as provided therein. After trial there was judgment in favor of defendant rejecting plaintiff’s demands, from which he brings this appeal.

The evidence on trial was not transcribed but a summary thereof has been supplied by a stipulation of facts agreed upon by counsel for the parties which is incorporated in the record. We quote the stipulation in its entirety as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cook v. CrowLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. McCardle v. NagimLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Canulette Shipbuilding Co. v. Hursey Transportation Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
  2. Walker v. DelahoussayeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Brashears v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Beardmore v. AbbottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  5. Gleason v. BarrilleauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API