Legal Opinion

Armour v. Union Carbide Corp.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1980PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this case a controlling issue is whether or not the provisions of Chapter 295 of the Public Acts of 1979, effective July 1, 1979, relative to the payment of workmen’s compensation awards in a lump sum, can be retroactively applied.

In the case of Valles v. Daniel Construction Co., 589 S.W.2d 911 (Tenn.1979), the Court held that the provisions of this Act, which are clearly more than merely procedural in nature, could not be given retroactive application.

The judgment of the trial court purporting to apply the provisions of the statute to a judgment entered prior to its effective date…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Valles v. Daniel Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. CNA Insurance Co. v. N. L. TransouTennessee Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API