Kamen v. Nordberg
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice White
The issue here is when mandamus relief will be available to a party who claims that the District Court wrongly deprived him of the right to a jury trial. Petitioner is a shareholder in a mutual fund and brought a derivative suit against the two companies that administer the fund, alleging breach of fiduciary duty under § 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U. S. C. § 80a-35(b). The District Court granted defendants’ motion to strike petitioner’s demand for a jury trial on this claim, and petitioner sought mandamus from the Court of Appeals to compel the District Court to honor his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In re VorpahlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Black v. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- In Re: Bertram ZweibonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.