Legal Opinion

2505 Bedford Realty Co. v. Woodson

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided February 24, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Diana Johnson, J.

Respondent moves for partial summary judgment, seeking *898an order from the court determining the legal rent for the premises.

As conceded by the respondent the essence of the dispute as to the legal rent involves two increases taken while the premises was vacant. These increases were based on improvements and new equipment, taken without approval of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) pursuant to section 2522.4 (a) of the Rent Stabilization Code (9 NYCRR).* Respondent argues, notwithstanding this Code section, that the Rent Stabilization Law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Salvati v. EimickeNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Nicholas v. KahnNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. 985 Fifth Avenue Inc. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Aron Assocs. v. De La CruzCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rockaway One Co. v. WigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Global Management v. RichardsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1992
  3. Rockaway One Co. v. WigginsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004
  4. City of New York v. OmolukumCivil Court of the City of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API