Legal Opinion
Craig v. State Civil Service Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 7, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge COLINS.
Daniel Craig, pro se, petitions for review of the order of the State Civil Service Commission (Commission) denying his request for a hearing because he failed to allege specific acts of discrimination as required by 4 Pa.Code § 105.12(c) (Code). We affirm in part, and vacate and remand in part.
On November 9, 2001, Craig was advised that he was discharged from his Clerk 2 position, probationary Civil Service status, because he did not successfully complete his probationary period. Craig challenged the determination and filled out an appeal request form. On the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hunter v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Keim v. Commonwealth, Department of HealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Pannacci v. STATE CIVIL SERV. COMM.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Delaware County Board of Assistance v. BalanowCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Bellew v. Commonwealth, State Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Allen v. State Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Craig v. CIV. SERV. COMM.(ENV. PROT. DEPT.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002