Legal Opinion

Winn Dixie v. Teneyck

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 19, 1995No. 93-4163PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Judge.

Finding that Thelma Teneyck, a claimant for workers’ compensation benefits, had been prejudiced by an asserted discovery violation, the judge of compensation claims refused to permit appellants to introduce evidence to prove their intended defense under Martin v. Carpenter, 132 So.2d 400 (Fla.1961). We conclude that no discovery violation justified excluding evidence in support of this defense. We reverse and remand to afford appellants an opportunity to present their defense.

By letters dated July 19, August 6, and August 20, 1993, Crawford & Company apprised the judge of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin Company v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  2. Metropolitan Dade County v. BermudezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. AREA ELEC. SERVICE, INC. v. CunninghamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Stephens v. S. FURNITURE TRANSP., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Raulerson v. FinneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garvin v. TidwellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Irving v. Ametek, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Irving v. Ametek, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API