Legal Opinion
Narragansett Bay Insurance v. Kaplan
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 18, 2015No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-12466-DPWPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
At issue in this case is whether an insurance company has a duty to defend its policyholders in a state court lawsuit against them alleging the commission of three intentional wrongs arising from.-a dispute among neighbors.. .Defendants Kenneth and Donna Kaplan reside in Hull, Massachusetts, and purchased a homeowner’s insurance policy with a Mariner Plus endorsement from plaintiff Narragansett Bay Insurance Company (“Narragansett”). That policy includes liability insurance for the Kaplans, the terms of which will be…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Carmona v. ToledoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Vineberg v. BissonnetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Polaroid Corp. v. the Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Atain Specialty Ins. Co. v. Bos. Rickshaw LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Lee Kennedy Co. v. Arch Ins. Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. PikeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- AIG Property Casualty Company v. RosenthalDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Boston Rickshaw LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.