Legal Opinion

Salzman v. His Creditors

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1842PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The syndic of the creditors of Salzman, and S. T. Hobson & Co. are appellants from a judgment of the District Court of the First District, Buchanan, J., on certain oppositions to a provisional tableau of distribution filed by the former.

1Opinion of the CourtMorphy, J.

This caso comes before us on several oppositions to a tableau of distribution filed by the syndic. We shall examine them, in the order in which they have been passed upon by the judgment appealed from.

I. The claim of Louisa Ann Salzman, the insolvent’s wife, for $2100, which she alleges was received by her husband, appears to us unsupported by sufficient evidence. It was attempted to be proved by her sister, who, it is evident, knew nothing of her own personal knowledge. She gives as the reason of her belief that Louisa A. Salzman had at the time of her marriage, and placed in the hands of…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Keystone Bridge Co. v. SummersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Roanoke City v. BeekowitzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885
  3. The SamuelSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  4. Meyer v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Hope v. Norfolk & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API