Legal Opinion
Dobransky v. CSX Transportation Inc.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Decided April 3, 1996No. 58 of 1989, C.APublished
1Opinion of the Court
PRATT, J.,
After a jury trial, which was completed on March 28, 1995, all parties timely filed motions for post-trial relief in accordance with Pa.R.C.P. 227.1. Due to a delay in the court stenographer transcribing the notes of testimony, oral argument of the motions was not conducted until December 13,1995 at which time defendant Taylor Township, upon its own motion, was granted leave to withdraw its motion for post-trial relief. The matters remaining before this court, therefore, are defendant CSX Transportation Inc.’s motion for post-trial relief in the nature of a motion for judgment…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lawrence D. Caldwell v. Harold G. Miller, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Cummings v. Nazareth BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Lockhart v. ListSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Wiedeman v. Dixie Elec. Membership Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.