Legal Opinion

Munoz v. City of San Diego

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1974No. Civ. No. 12744PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AULT, J.

This action was filed by plaintiff as an elector of San Diego to obtain a declaration that the portion of the.city charter which fixes the salary of councilmen at $5,000 per annum (portion of art. Ill, § 12) is unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and under article I, sections 21 and 24 of the California Constitution. Plaintiff’s theory is that this salary has become so inadequate as the result of inflation that it now economically discriminates against electors who have families to support, in effect imposes a property qualification…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Zeilenga v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Doughterty v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. County of San Diego v. BryanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Malinou v. PowersSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API