Midland Funding, LLC v. Mizinski
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtStark, J.
¶ 1. Jeff Mizinski appeals orders denying his motion to quash an earnings garnishment and his motion for reconsideration. Mizinski argues the circuit court lacked in rem jurisdiction to garnish his wages because the wages were not located in the state of Wisconsin. However, we conclude in rem jurisdiction over the wages was not required. Pursuant to Dalton v. *477Meister, 71 Wis. 2d 504, 239 N.W.2d 9 (1976), the circuit court could properly issue an in personam order directing Mizinski's employer to remit a portion of his wages to Midland Funding, LLC, the entity that filed the garnishment. We…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- Industrial Risk Insurers & Quad Graphics, Inc. v. American Engineering Testing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- Morawetz v. Sun Insurance OfficeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Vanstone v. Town of DelafieldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.