Legal Opinion

Flowers v. 73rd Townhouse LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 2012PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The documentary evidence submitted on the motion — namely, checks from the Law Offices of Milton S. Rinzler to certain defendants — failed to show conclusively that plaintiff’s claims were time-barred. The affidavits submitted by defendants were not “documentary evidence” within the meaning of CPLR 3211 (a) (1) (see e.g. Granada Condominium III Assn. v Palomino, 78 AD3d 996, 997 [2d Dept 2010]; Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d 78, 85-86 [2d Dept 2010]), and without the affidavits, it cannot be concluded that defendant 73rd Townhouse LLC made distributions that were protected by the statute of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fontanetta v. John Doe 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Granada Condominium III Ass'n v. PalominoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Baines v. Daily News L.P.New York Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Asmar v. 20th & Seventh Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. J.D. v. Archdiocese of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  4. J.D. v. Archdiocese of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  5. Manglani v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API