Legal Opinion

State v. Cardinal

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 30, 1983No. 82-1742PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKSTEIN, Judge.

The state seeks certiorari to quash an order of the circuit court which affirmed an order of the county court, dismissing the information filed therein as “vague in regard to the manner in which the defendant became intoxicated.” We grant the petition, quash the order and remand to the trial court for proceedings consistent herewith.

The information charged that respondent on a certain date “did unlawfully drive or operate a motor vehicle over the highways, streets or thoroughfares of Florida while in an intoxicated condition, contrary to F.S. 860.01(1).” The subject statute,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ingram v. PettitSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. Gibbs v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  5. State v. FieldsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BlockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Maffea v. MoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Downs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. State v. RahnLee County Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API