Legal Opinion

Klein v. Moutz, 23473 (6-27-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2007No. 23473PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court. Each error assigned has been reviewed and the following disposition is made: {¶ 1} Appellants, Evelyn and Harry Klein, appeal from the judgment of the Akron Municipal Court which awarded them attorney's fees in the amount of $1,725. This Court affirms.

I

{¶ 2} On September 26, 2006, this Court decided the first appeal in this matter. See Klein v. Moutz, 9th Dist. No. 23132, 2006-Ohio-4974. In that decision, this Court noted that the award of attorney fees to a successful party is mandatory under R.C. 5321.16(C).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. John Whitfield v. Charles Scully, Former Supt. Gail Haponik C.O. Tornabene C.O. C. Mitchell John and Jane DoesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. Christe v. GMS Management Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cruz v. English Nanny & Governess SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Klein v. MoutzOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. Kincer, Ca2006-08-055 (7-2-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Klein v. MoutzOhio Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API