Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. Tulsa Public Schools

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 7, 1998No. 89856PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ALMA WILSON, Justice:

¶ 1 The sua sponte jurisdictional issue we consider is: Whether the date of mailing constitutes the date of filing pursuant tó 12 O.S.Supp.1996, § 990A only when the litigant utilizes certified mail, return receipt requested, postal service provided by the United States Post Office. We conclude that the date of mailing as established by the postmark affixed by the United States Post Office constitutes the date of filing pursuant to 12 O.S.Supp.1996, § 990A(B). We hold this review proceeding was timely commenced.

¶ 2 This is a review proceeding from an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neumann v. Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Curtis v. Board of Education of Sayre Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. City of Tulsa v. Board of Trustees of Police PensionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Rusk ex rel. McGilvery v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Conterez v. O'DONNELLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Horvat v. State ex rel. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. Neely v. First State Bank, HarrahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULES OF OK. SUP. CT. (WORKERS' COMPENSATION CT.)Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
  5. IN RE: AMENDMENT OF OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT RULE 1.4.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API