Legal Opinion

Way v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 5, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover the amount of an insurance policy issued by the corporate defendant upon the life of plaintiff’s mother-in-law. The pohcy was of the so-called industrial type, payable, by its terms, to the executor or administrator of the insured, unless, at the option of the insurer, it should be paid to some person equitably entitled thereto under the so-called “ facility of payment ” clause. Plaintiff’s proof shows that the policy was delivered to her, that she paid all the premiums, and had possession of the policy until after the death of the insured.

*425The complaint alleges that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Kasper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Copeland v. HugoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marine Midland Bank v. John E. Russo Produce Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Pfeil Construction Corp. v. MoleyNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Farrington v. FarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  4. Way v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API