Legal Opinion

Broyhill v. Broyhill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1986No. 8528DC1101Published

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

By his sole assignment of error, defendant-appellant contends that the venue of this motion in the cause should not have been transferred to Mecklenburg County. G.S. § 5043.5(f) in pertinent part provides:

Venue. An action or proceeding in the courts of this State for . . . support of a minor child may be maintained in the county where the child resides ... or in the county where a parent resides, except as hereinafter provided. If an action ... for divorce . . . has been previously instituted in this State, until there has been a final judgment in such case, any action or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tate v. TateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Kennedy v. SurrattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API