Broyhill v. Broyhill
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
By his sole assignment of error, defendant-appellant contends that the venue of this motion in the cause should not have been transferred to Mecklenburg County. G.S. § 5043.5(f) in pertinent part provides:
Venue. An action or proceeding in the courts of this State for . . . support of a minor child may be maintained in the county where the child resides ... or in the county where a parent resides, except as hereinafter provided. If an action ... for divorce . . . has been previously instituted in this State, until there has been a final judgment in such case, any action or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tate v. TateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Kennedy v. SurrattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976