Legal Opinion

Sonderman v. Remington Const. Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 2, 1992PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

*98POLLOCK, J.

The primary issue is whether a property owner who did not receive actual notice of an in rem tax foreclosure can defeat a quiet title action brought by a subsequent purchaser who did not know of the defective notice at the time of purchase from the municipality.

Before 1983 defendant Remington Construction Co., Inc. (Remington) was the record owner of the property in question. In 1983 defendant Township of Jackson (the Township) acquired title to the property through a tax foreclosure. Shortly thereafter, plaintiff, Kevin Sonderman, purchased…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Weintraub v. KrobatschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  5. Palamarg Realty Company v. RehacSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Harrison Redevelopment Agency v. DeRoseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  2. Freehold Office Park, Ltd. v. Township of FreeholdNew Jersey Tax Court · 1992
  3. Sobel v. Long Island EntertainmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  4. Wohlegmuth v. 560 Ocean ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. First Citizens National Bank v. SherwoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API