Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Australia Pacific Resources, Ltd.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1992No. 92CA0001Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge RULAND.

In this action to recover a finder’s fee, plaintiff, Charosa Olga Kerr, appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants, Australia Pacific Resources, Ltd. (APR), APM Land, Inc., APM Tailings, Inc., and William Howell. We affirm.

In March of 1988, William Wiley and defendant APR entered into an “Exclusive Buyer’s Agency Contract” whereby Wiley was appointed agent “for the acquisition of any property [APR as buyer] wishes to acquire ... of that property known as Gold Hill Mesa” located in Colorado Springs. The Golden Cycle Mill was previously located on the mesa, and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Broughall v. Black Forest Development Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Schnell v. GustafsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Hayes v. Alaska Juneau Forest Industries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Barton v. SittnerColorado Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API